Blind Plea Agreement

    One of the reasons for the reduction of sentences is to encourage the accused to come to the proverbial table. In addition, an accused who pleads guilty is held responsible for his or her actions and shows remorse. The justice system believes that they should be punished less severely than those who refuse to admit guilt, thus forcing the state to spend the time and cost of a trial. Many people plead guilty without first speaking to a criminal defense lawyer. An admission of guilt to a criminal complaint could remain on your permanent record, making it difficult to find a job, rent an apartment, and if you are currently receiving state assistance, you could lose those benefits. Defendants generally accept oral arguments for two reasons: due to the nature of blind pleadings, they are generally not recommended. When the plea is filed, the judge asks the accused a long series of scripted questions to ensure that the accused has knowingly and voluntarily received the pleading agreement. The judge deals with these issues to ensure that the constitutional rights of the accused have been sufficiently protected throughout the trial and even on the day the pleadings are introduced. No judge will accept a criminal procedure agreement without regard to good constitutional considerations. Since it virtually eliminates all grounds for challenging a plea, it is necessary to have a very strong legal argument, which puts forward exceptional circumstances, so that a plea can be set aside at a later date. Never enter into a Plea deal in a hurry or without the advice of an experienced lawyer at The Watt Law Firm. The key to success after blind advocacy is the possibility of being able to proceed to an exceptional sentencing hearing.

    Comments are closed.